WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



simon.s 12:28 Tue Jan 4
Re: Adam Traore
I think they were interested before us.

Sydney_Iron 12:13 Tue Jan 4
Re: Adam Traore
Spurs are now interested apparently? We all know what Mr Levy is like when it comes to players West Ham may want to sign.........

SUM A DING WONG 10:26 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
Player in not being played, because he's about to be sold shocker.

Sven Roeder 10:24 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
Heard he beat Van der Beek 12-7 in games of hangman on the bench.
He now leads 10-9 in their season long tournament

⚒️ 10:01 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
“how did lingard do ?”

Looked lively on the bench.

Side of Ham 9:45 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
I would only see him as a replacement for Yarmolenko who could possibly strike up a frightening attack force with Antonio or Bowen and better still both. There are games where we just need to bulldoze the opposition and I think those three together would do the job.

simon.s 9:44 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
I'd let the front wheels have him.

Irish Hammer 9:41 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
Not first choice Wolves. When judging by his perceived strengths he should be exactly what they would pick to play away from home against a big club. Pace and power to burn.

Yet he’s on the bench. Right so

Irish Hammer 9:37 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore

We need to spending a lot more than 20m to get the level of striker we need.

This would be the boards way of throwing us a relatively cheap bone without it being fit for purpose

Crassus 9:33 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
Not sure he is what’s needed
But ….
He is one handful who certainly rattled Utd

Btw, if Wolves could finish they would be some side, played them off the park - puts our loss into perspective

master 9:33 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
Completely static off the ball too, whether his team is in possession or not. Not a Moyes player.

1964 9:30 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
Big bruiser but crap footballer

Jasnik 9:30 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
how did lingard do ?

paulon 9:28 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
Yep. He’s shit

Browno22 9:24 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
I think he's looked absolutely shit, even against an awful tiring defence

Lily Hammer 9:24 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
That’s a fair call.

I’m still not convinced we should use any of our limited budget on him this window.

Kaiser Zoso 9:24 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
He can’t pass the salt, useless oiled up lump

⚒️ 9:23 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
Man Utd had started to turn the screw a bit. Bruno Fernandez should’ve scored for them, and Ronaldo had one disallowed.

Lily Hammer 9:21 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
To be fair, Wolves had already been running the rags ragged for most of the match.

⚒️ 9:19 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
Lily Hammer 9:17 Mon Jan 3

True. But his directness changed the complexion of the game.

Sven Roeder 9:19 Mon Jan 3
Re: Adam Traore
Karren Brady just been seen in Knightsbridge Boots filling a trolley with Baby Oil

ITS ON!

Prev - Page 2 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: